Rejected kirby's Admin Application

Status
Not open for further replies.

kirby

New member
Supporter
Member
May 2, 2026
7
1
3


What is your Steam ID
STEAM_0:0:9373109

What name(s) do you use on the server(s)?
kirby †

How old are you?
22

What server(s) do you normally play?
Easy Surf

Have you been banned from Insanity Gaming before?
No

What qualifies you to be an admin at Insanity Gaming?
I have been playing surf in general for many years, mostly on FN but I've recently been a consistent player on IG. It's a super fun server with pretty good people, so I'd like to help out if possible. I do cause some ruckus, but I've never been banned and I try my best to adhere to the rules set in place. I love surfing, and am on pretty often, so I would be able to help out wherever help might be lacking.
 
Hold Up What GIF
 
I do cause some ruckus
-Rep

Just based on that sentence alone, I cannot in good faith recommend you to our admin team. You really enjoy stirring the pot on surf and have been known to shift the entire mood of the server. I understand you have certain beliefs, great. But when it comes up in every single conversation on the server, it gets fairly redundant and stale quickly. Counter strike is a lot of things, but a religious podcast is not one of them. I know you are very active and probably a nice guy, but someone who intentionally causes a ruckus and makes people feel uncomfortable is not a personality trait we look for in recruiting admins.
 
-rep
The relation of the individual to his fantasy is very largely conditioned by his relation to the unconscious in general, and this in turn is conditioned in particular by the spirit of the age. According to the degree of rationalism that prevails, the individual will be more disposed or less to have dealings with the unconscious and its products. Christianity, like every closed system of religion, has an undoubted tendency to suppress the unconscious in the individual as much as possible, thus paralyzing his fantasy activity. Instead, religion offers stereotyped symbolic concepts that are meant to take the place of his unconscious once and for all. The symbolic concepts of all religions are recreations of unconscious processes in a typical, universally binding form. Religious teaching supplies, as it were, the final information about the “last things” and the world beyond human consciousness. Wherever we can observe a religion being born, we see how the doctrinal figures flow into the founder himself as revelations, in other words as concretizations of his unconscious fantasy. The forms welling up from his unconscious are declared to be universally valid and thus replace the individual fantasies of others. The evangelist Matthew has preserved for us a fragment of this process from the life of Christ: in the story of the temptation we see how the idea of kingship rises out of the founder’s unconscious in the visionary form of the devil, who offers him power over all the kingdoms of the earth. Had Christ misunderstood the fantasy and taken it concretely, there would have been one madman the more in the world. But he rejected the concretism of his fantasy and entered the world as a king to whom the kingdoms of heaven are subject. He was therefore no paranoiac, as the result also proved. The views advanced from time to time from the psychiatric side concerning the morbidity of Christ’s psychology are nothing but ludicrous rationalistic twaddle, with no comprehension whatever of the meaning of such processes in the history of mankind.

The form in which Christ presented the content of his unconscious to the world became accepted and was declared valid for all. Thereafter all individual fantasies became otiose and worthless, and were persecuted as heretical, as the fate of the Gnostic movement and of all later heresies testifies. The prophet Jeremiah is speaking just in this vein when he warns (ch. 23):


16. Thus saith the Lord of hosts, Hearken not unto the words of the prophets that prophesy unto you: they make you vain: they speak a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the Lord. 25. I have heard what the prophets said that prophesy lies in my name, saying, I have dreamed, I have dreamed. 26. How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart; 27. Which think to cause my people to forget my name by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbour, as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal. 28. The prophet that hath a dream, let him tell a dream; and he that hath my word, let him speak my word faithfully. What is the chaff to the wheat? saith the Lord

[82] Similarly, we see in early Christianity how the bishops zealously strove to stamp out the activity of the individual unconscious among the monks. The archbishop Athanasius of Alexandria in his biography of St. Anthony gives us particularly valuable insights in this respect. By way of instruction to his monks, he describes the apparitions and visions, the perils of the soul, which befall those that pray and fast in solitude. He warns them how cleverly the devil disguises himself in order to bring saintly men to their downfall. The devil is, of course, the voice of the anchorite’s own unconscious, in revolt against the forcible suppression of his nature.

-Why Kirby is Annoying
Thread starter fiberO4 Start date May 8, 2026
 
  • Haha
  • Thumbs Down
Reactions: catfoodcan and flav
-rep
The relation of the individual to his fantasy is very largely conditioned by his relation to the unconscious in general, and this in turn is conditioned in particular by the spirit of the age. According to the degree of rationalism that prevails, the individual will be more disposed or less to have dealings with the unconscious and its products. Christianity, like every closed system of religion, has an undoubted tendency to suppress the unconscious in the individual as much as possible, thus paralyzing his fantasy activity. Instead, religion offers stereotyped symbolic concepts that are meant to take the place of his unconscious once and for all. The symbolic concepts of all religions are recreations of unconscious processes in a typical, universally binding form. Religious teaching supplies, as it were, the final information about the “last things” and the world beyond human consciousness. Wherever we can observe a religion being born, we see how the doctrinal figures flow into the founder himself as revelations, in other words as concretizations of his unconscious fantasy. The forms welling up from his unconscious are declared to be universally valid and thus replace the individual fantasies of others. The evangelist Matthew has preserved for us a fragment of this process from the life of Christ: in the story of the temptation we see how the idea of kingship rises out of the founder’s unconscious in the visionary form of the devil, who offers him power over all the kingdoms of the earth. Had Christ misunderstood the fantasy and taken it concretely, there would have been one madman the more in the world. But he rejected the concretism of his fantasy and entered the world as a king to whom the kingdoms of heaven are subject. He was therefore no paranoiac, as the result also proved. The views advanced from time to time from the psychiatric side concerning the morbidity of Christ’s psychology are nothing but ludicrous rationalistic twaddle, with no comprehension whatever of the meaning of such processes in the history of mankind.

The form in which Christ presented the content of his unconscious to the world became accepted and was declared valid for all. Thereafter all individual fantasies became otiose and worthless, and were persecuted as heretical, as the fate of the Gnostic movement and of all later heresies testifies. The prophet Jeremiah is speaking just in this vein when he warns (ch. 23):




[82] Similarly, we see in early Christianity how the bishops zealously strove to stamp out the activity of the individual unconscious among the monks. The archbishop Athanasius of Alexandria in his biography of St. Anthony gives us particularly valuable insights in this respect. By way of instruction to his monks, he describes the apparitions and visions, the perils of the soul, which befall those that pray and fast in solitude. He warns them how cleverly the devil disguises himself in order to bring saintly men to their downfall. The devil is, of course, the voice of the anchorite’s own unconscious, in revolt against the forcible suppression of his nature.

-Why Kirby is Annoying
Thread starter fiberO4 Start date May 8, 2026
I am NOT reading allat! 💯
 
-Rep

Just based on that sentence alone, I cannot in good faith recommend you to our admin team. You really enjoy stirring the pot on surf and have been known to shift the entire mood of the server. I understand you have certain beliefs, great. But when it comes up in every single conversation on the server, it gets fairly redundant and stale quickly. Counter strike is a lot of things, but a religious podcast is not one of them. I know you are very active and probably a nice guy, but someone who intentionally causes a ruckus and makes people feel uncomfortable is not a personality trait we look for in recruiting admins.
I can't tell if this is rage bait or if you have a severe lack of observation skills. If you think I'm the one starting those conversations, you've proven it's the latter. I've brought it up a total of 2-3 times ever, the rest of the conversations start out of rage bait filth from people like water or giggles (people like them, to include them, but they are not the only two restricted to starting the filth).

When I cause ruckus, it is not related to that kind of conversation. It's usually something similar to the way Bananarama acts. You also act like "causing ruckus" is a disqualifier to obtaining the admin role. Characters such as elite, Aleph, Interp, etc. do that kind of nonsense all the time and they are mods on the server as well.

-rep on your comment. You clearly can't think for yourself smh. Just reposting other people's fake opinions.
 
  • Thumbs Down
  • Like
Reactions: catfoodcan and flav
-rep
The relation of the individual to his fantasy is very largely conditioned by his relation to the unconscious in general, and this in turn is conditioned in particular by the spirit of the age. According to the degree of rationalism that prevails, the individual will be more disposed or less to have dealings with the unconscious and its products. Christianity, like every closed system of religion, has an undoubted tendency to suppress the unconscious in the individual as much as possible, thus paralyzing his fantasy activity. Instead, religion offers stereotyped symbolic concepts that are meant to take the place of his unconscious once and for all. The symbolic concepts of all religions are recreations of unconscious processes in a typical, universally binding form. Religious teaching supplies, as it were, the final information about the “last things” and the world beyond human consciousness. Wherever we can observe a religion being born, we see how the doctrinal figures flow into the founder himself as revelations, in other words as concretizations of his unconscious fantasy. The forms welling up from his unconscious are declared to be universally valid and thus replace the individual fantasies of others. The evangelist Matthew has preserved for us a fragment of this process from the life of Christ: in the story of the temptation we see how the idea of kingship rises out of the founder’s unconscious in the visionary form of the devil, who offers him power over all the kingdoms of the earth. Had Christ misunderstood the fantasy and taken it concretely, there would have been one madman the more in the world. But he rejected the concretism of his fantasy and entered the world as a king to whom the kingdoms of heaven are subject. He was therefore no paranoiac, as the result also proved. The views advanced from time to time from the psychiatric side concerning the morbidity of Christ’s psychology are nothing but ludicrous rationalistic twaddle, with no comprehension whatever of the meaning of such processes in the history of mankind.

The form in which Christ presented the content of his unconscious to the world became accepted and was declared valid for all. Thereafter all individual fantasies became otiose and worthless, and were persecuted as heretical, as the fate of the Gnostic movement and of all later heresies testifies. The prophet Jeremiah is speaking just in this vein when he warns (ch. 23):




[82] Similarly, we see in early Christianity how the bishops zealously strove to stamp out the activity of the individual unconscious among the monks. The archbishop Athanasius of Alexandria in his biography of St. Anthony gives us particularly valuable insights in this respect. By way of instruction to his monks, he describes the apparitions and visions, the perils of the soul, which befall those that pray and fast in solitude. He warns them how cleverly the devil disguises himself in order to bring saintly men to their downfall. The devil is, of course, the voice of the anchorite’s own unconscious, in revolt against the forcible suppression of his nature.

-Why Kirby is Annoying
Thread starter fiberO4 Start date May 8, 2026
I appreciate the kind criticism, I will take this information into mind kami!
 
I can't tell if this is rage bait or if you have a severe lack of observation skills. If you think I'm the one starting those conversations, you've proven it's the latter. I've brought it up a total of 2-3 times ever, the rest of the conversations start out of rage bait filth from people like water or giggles (people like them, to include them, but they are not the only two restricted to starting the filth).

When I cause ruckus, it is not related to that kind of conversation. It's usually something similar to the way Bananarama acts. You also act like "causing ruckus" is a disqualifier to obtaining the admin role. Characters such as elite, Aleph, Interp, etc. do that kind of nonsense all the time and they are mods on the server as well.

-rep on your comment. You clearly can't think for yourself smh. Just reposting other people's fake opinions.
I assure you my judgment is sound. If you want to disagree with me, fine, you have that right. Everything I said was based on my own personal experience of playing on the server with you. And honestly, I have yet to have 1 good encounter, my most memorable one was you openly stating that "Post-partum isnt real, it's a myth". I'm not sure if that was just ragebait or blatant misogyny. Nonetheless, you compared yourself to Bananarama of all people. Cmon man,.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: kirby and Seno
Status
Not open for further replies.